Drop the toplevel-vs-popup reftest
authorMatthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>
Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:15:05 +0000 (15:15 -0500)
committerMatthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>
Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:15:05 +0000 (15:15 -0500)
Popups look different from toplevels. I don't think
a reftest that tries to prove otherwise has much
leg to stand on.

testsuite/reftests/meson.build
testsuite/reftests/toplevel-vs-popup.ref.ui [deleted file]
testsuite/reftests/toplevel-vs-popup.ui [deleted file]

index 71080d6f32e9fff1aa1a8cf0309d0942442d0318..33ecccbe5a5c1744e440935c691bec7235c4b6fa 100644 (file)
@@ -397,8 +397,6 @@ testdata = [
   'textview-margins.ui',
   'textview-tags.ref.ui',
   'textview-tags.ui',
-  'toplevel-vs-popup.ref.ui',
-  'toplevel-vs-popup.ui',
   'treeview-crash-too-wide.ref.ui',
   'treeview-crash-too-wide.ui',
   'treeview-fixed-height.css',
diff --git a/testsuite/reftests/toplevel-vs-popup.ref.ui b/testsuite/reftests/toplevel-vs-popup.ref.ui
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 5611565..0000000
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<interface>
-  <object class="GtkWindow" id="window1">
-    <property name="type">popup</property>
-    <child>
-      <object class="GtkLabel" id="label1">
-        <property name="label" translatable="yes">Hello World</property>
-      </object>
-    </child>
-  </object>
-</interface>
diff --git a/testsuite/reftests/toplevel-vs-popup.ui b/testsuite/reftests/toplevel-vs-popup.ui
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index fdd99a6..0000000
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<interface>
-  <object class="GtkWindow" id="window1">
-    <child>
-      <object class="GtkLabel" id="label1">
-        <property name="label" translatable="yes">Hello World</property>
-      </object>
-    </child>
-  </object>
-</interface>